Haven't signed into your Scholastic account before?
Teachers, not yet a subscriber?
Subscribers receive access to the website and print magazine.
You are being redirecting to Scholastic's authentication page...
Announcements & Tutorials
Renew Now, Pay Later
Sharing Google Activities
2 min.
Setting Up Student View
Exploring Your Issue
Using Text to Speech
Join Our Facebook Group!
Subscriber Only Resources
Access this article and hundreds more like it with a subscription to Scholastic Art magazine.
Article Options
Presentation View
Lexile® measure
5 Things to Know About Celebrity Portraits
How do the artists who made these works document their famous subjects?
Emanuel Leutze (1816-1868), Washington Crossing the Delaware, 1851. Oil on canvas. Metropolitan Museum of Art.
In what ways did Leutze base this painting on real-life events? Which details did he dramatize?
1. Add Drama for Emphasis
Think of the last time you heard someone tell a story. Did he or she exaggerate details in the narrative for a certain effect? In his 1851 painting Washington Crossing the Delaware, above, German American artist Emanuel Leutze dramatizes real-life events. He depicts George Washington leading American troops across the Delaware River in 1776. Leutze painted large chunks of ice on the river, exaggerating their size. In reality, ice that big would have been unlikely to form on the Delaware. Leutze sensationalized the scene and created the work on a large scale to glorify Washington’s legacy.
Think of the last time someone told you a story. Did he or she exaggerate details in the narrative? German American artist Emanuel Leutze dramatizes real events in his 1851 painting Washington Crossing the Delaware, above. Leutze shows George Washington leading soldiers across the Delaware River in 1776. Large ice chunks jut out of the river—but the ice wasn’t that big in real life. Leutze exaggerates the scene to draw attention to the dangerous mission and show the men’s bravery
Hans Namuth (1915-1990), Jackson Pollack, 1950. Gelatin silver print. National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution. Photograph by Hans Namuth. ©1991 Hans Namuth Estate, courtesy of the Center for Creative Photography.
What did the public gain from Namuth’s photo of Pollock’s process?
2. Show the Subject in Action
Portraits don’t always have to be posed. In 1950, photographer Hans Namuth gave audiences a chance to see an artistic icon at work. In the mid-20th century, Jackson Pollock captivated viewers with his Abstract Expressionist art. His process of action painting was as mysterious as his nonrepresentational compositions. Then in a series of photographs, Namuth revealed Pollock’s secrets, showing the artist at work. After setting his canvas on the floor, Pollock moved around it, splattering and pouring paint onto the canvas. Notice areas where the image blurs with Pollock’s motion. Namuth had an eye for documenting the artist in action from behind his camera lens.
Portraits don’t have to be posed. In 1950, photographer Hans Namuth documented a famous artist at work. Jackson Pollock had become known for his chaotic, paint-splattered art. But his process, called action painting, was a mystery to the public. In a series of photos, Namuth revealed Pollock’s secrets. Instead of working at an easel, Pollock set his canvas on the floor. He moved around it, splattering and pouring paint onto the canvas. Do you notice how some parts of the photo are blurry? This shows that Pollock was in motion.
Herb Ritts (1952-2002), David Hockney, Los Angeles, 1989. Photograph. ©Herb Ritts/Trunk Archive.
What do the paintings add to Ritts’s depiction of Hockney?
3. Express Ideas With Symbols
Sometimes small details in a portrait can reveal a lot about the subject. In the 1949 self-portrait above, Frida Kahlo uses symbols to share her ideas about Diego Rivera. Both Mexican painters, Kahlo and Rivera had a tumultuous relationship. They married, divorced, and remarried. Kahlo titled the painting above Diego y yo, which is Spanish for “Diego and I.” She paints a miniature portrait of Rivera on her forehead, showing that he’s on her mind. She adds tears dripping from the corners of her eyes. How does Kahlo express her ideas about Rivera using these symbols?
Small details in a portrait can reveal a lot about the subjects. In her 1949 self-portrait above, Mexican artist Frida Kahlo shares her ideas about Diego Rivera, who was also a Mexican painter. They had a rocky relationship. Kahlo titled the work Diego y yo, which is Spanish for “Diego and I.” She uses symbols to express herself. She paints a portrait of Rivera on her forehead to show that he’s on her mind. She also adds tears falling from her eyes.
Frida Kahlo (1907-1954), Diego y yo, 1949. Oil on canvas. Courtesy of Sotheby’s America/ Artist Rights Society (ARS), New York.
Which details make this a symbolic self-portrait?
4. Include Attributes That Identify the Sitter
You are what you eat. Something similar might be said about an artist: You are what you make. Herb Ritts was a prominent American fashion photographer in the 1980s and ’90s. For his 1989 photo above, Ritts captures English painter David Hockney. Hockney holds a portrait he painted so it hides his face. He stands in front of a wall of his portraits and a painting of water, one of his signature subjects. Ritts includes the paintings as attributes that people associate with Hockney. By covering Hockney’s face, Ritts suggests that Hockney is his work, and his work is him.
David Hockney is a famous English artist. American photographer Herb Ritts made the 1989 portrait of him above. Hockney hides his face behind a portrait he painted of someone else. More of his art is displayed behind him, including a painting of water, one of Hockney’s favorite subjects. Ritts uses the art as attributes, or things that people associate with Hockney. Many viewers probably recognize Hockney’s art more quickly than his face!
Mickalene Thomas (b. 1971), Oprah Winfrey (When Ends Meet), 2007-2008. Screenprint with hand-applied rhinestones on 4-ply board. National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution/©2014 Mickalene Thomas/Artist Rights Society (ARS), New York.
Why does Thomas use rhinestones in her mixed-media portrait of Winfrey?
5. Use Meaningful Materials
Do you know anyone with a dazzling personality? This is how contemporary artist Mickalene Thomas sees media leader and philanthropist Oprah Winfrey, shown in the work above. Thomas adds rhinestones to her 2007-08 portrait of Winfrey, titled When Ends Meet, to illustrate the icon’s vivacious personality. The artist represents Winfrey’s bright smile, blue eyelids, and other details with rhinestones. Winfrey appears to make friendly eye contact with the viewer, demonstrating the celebrity’s gift for connecting with people. Artists like Thomas sometimes use mixed-media with intention to add deeper meaning to their work.
Do you know someone with a dazzling personality? This is how Mickalene Thomas sees talk show host, writer, and media leader Oprah Winfrey. Thomas captures Winfrey’s sparkling personality in her 2008 When Ends Meet, above. The portrait is mixed-media, which means Thomas used multiple kinds of materials. She includes many shiny rhinestones to draw attention to Winfrey’s bright smile and kind eyes. Thomas’s choice of materials helps her express what makes Winfrey so successful.
Article Type