News & Features
Shop Magazines
Customer Service
Customer Service
The teacher's online supplement to the only classic
and contemporary art magazine for students

Damien Hirst rocked the boat with this controversial piece.
Close Caption
Damien Hirst, The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living, 1991 (Sideview). Glass, painted steel, silicone, monofilament, shark and formaldehyde solution. 2,170 x 5,420 x 1,800 mm. © Damien Hirst and Science Ltd. All rights reserved, DACS/ARS 2014.
Preserved Predator
Is this real shark groundbreaking art?

How would you feel coming face-to-face with a 13-foot tiger shark in an art gallery? For his work titled The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living, contemporary British artist Damien Hirst wanted to present a shark that was “real enough to frighten you.” So instead of making a sculpture of a shark, he hired a fisherman in Australia to catch a real one. Experts then installed the shark in a glass-and-steel case filled with a chemical solution to preserve it. Created in 1991, this is still one of contemporary art’s most celebrated and controversial works.

The sculpture sparked a storm of media attention. Critics say it has plenty of shock value but little artistic value. Supporters counter that the work is thought-provoking and forces viewers to grapple with the boundary between life and death.

Others take issue with the methods used to create the artwork. Some feel that since Hirst didn’t make the work with his own hands, it isn’t art. But advocates believe that the idea is more important than the process. They compare Hirst’s work to that of modern artist Marcel Duchamp. Early in the 20th century, Duchamp collected commonplace objects, such as a urinal, and proclaimed them “art,” calling them “readymades.” Adding only a signature, Duchamp transformed the urinal into art. Like Duchamp, Hirst tried to redefine something from the real world as art.

This work launched Hirst’s career and sold for millions of dollars. With this now- famous fish, Hirst pushed the boundaries of art, and more than 20 years later, people are still talking about it.

What do you think? Is this art?


This is art. Art does not always have to be created by hand using pencil or paint. Art does not have to be constructed from marble or bronze. This is an object that took much thought and preparation in regard to its "presentation".It was created to be seen by others; to spark a thought and possibly a conversation about life, death, fear, juxtaposition, being free or confined, and much more.
Posted by: Kimberley K. | August 13, 2014 at 3:37 PM
This is art. The artist wants the viewer to see a particular object, in this case, a natural one, from his perspective. In this way, the artfulness of it is how this idea or perspective is presented. The artist has communicated a statement or an emotion through visual means.
Posted by: Karen G. | August 19, 2014 at 5:03 PM
i think that he should not get any credit because, he did not put any artistic effort into this project.
Posted by: Brandon W. | August 19, 2014 at 5:03 PM
I think Mr. Damien Hirst shall get no credentials for this project because it lacks uniqueness and its not original.
Posted by: Brandon W. | August 19, 2014 at 5:04 PM
This is not art, rather is it a representation of humans' disregard and disconnect from the natural world. It exemplifies that for some, nature and wildlife exists for the pleasure of human consumption. I understand utilizing "readymades", however, the process to produce this piece of "art" entailed commissioning the death of a shark.
Posted by: Ryan H. | August 20, 2014 at 7:15 PM
All the art work is focused on the shark not the background if there's not a background the picture doesn't seem complete!??
Posted by: Elizabeth r. | September 16, 2014 at 1:56 PM
No, the fisherman should get the credit because he got the main part of the picure
Posted by: Emma A. | September 16, 2014 at 1:56 PM
the shark looks so cool my friend Tiffani D showed me on the computer and i think the fisherman who caught this shark should get a little credit but it's not nice to kill animals like the shark but the shark could have more sharks witch means there would be more shark but eventually the older sharks would die
Posted by: Emily M. | September 19, 2014 at 1:58 PM
This preserved preditor is so cool and should not be on display. It is a crule thing to do. But yes it is very very very cool!!!!!!!
Posted by: Tiffani D. | September 19, 2014 at 2:00 PM
I think it's a painting because in the painting you can see the closed off walls from the body parts and if you look close enough you can see the cartoon like of the shark and the bolts. Therefore I think it is a painting.
Posted by: Shannon B. | September 23, 2014 at 2:33 PM

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated by Scholastic Editors. Your comments will not appear until they are approved by the Editors.
Enter your first name and the first initial of your last name only :
Enter comments here: