Time Is Running Out!

Back to school is almost here.
Ensure your class doesn’t miss a single issue!


Start your FREE TRIAL

How does this sculpture differ from the original photograph?
Close Caption
J. Seward Johnson (b. 1930), Unconditional Surrender, (The Kiss), 2007. Image: ©Gabriel Bouys / AFP / Getty Images.
The original photograph
Close Caption
Alfred Eisenstaedt (1898-1995), V-J Day, 1945. Times Square. ©Alfred Eisenstaedt/Time & Life Pictures/Getty Images.
Kissing Controversy
This sculpture, based on a famous photograph, led to heated public debate

They say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. But in the case of one artist, some critics disagree. American artist J. Seward Johnson is known for his sculptures inspired by famous paintings and photographs. One of these works—a supersized sculpture based on a 1945 photograph of a sailor kissing a nurse at the end of World War II—is causing debate in San Diego. Supporters praise the 25-foot-tall work, Unconditional Surrender, for its depiction of a moment in American history. Critics say it is unoriginal because it doesn’t significantly change the intent of the original photo by Alfred Eisenstaedt.

Johnson fabricated the original work with foam and urethane. The artist installed it in 2007 and it became a popular attraction. After several years of exposure to the elements, the work began to deteriorate. So Johnson created a bronze version to replace it.

The city’s Commission for Arts and Culture voted against installing the bronze version, arguing that the work lacked artistic merit. Many artists appropriate, or borrow, from existing art. But critics say that by changing only the scale and medium, Johnson hasn’t changed the work significantly enough for it to be considered original. “It’s a really bad piece of public art. It’s an appropriated 3-D copy of a photograph,” says Hugh Davies, director of the Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego.

Despite the critics’ opinions, public support for the artwork won out. In 2012, the USS Midway Museum raised more than $1 million to have the bronze version installed. Museum official Scott McGaugh says that given San Diego’s rich military history, the sculpture made sense. “We saw it as an appropriate memorial.”

Since the bronze sculpture’s installation, it has continued to be popular with the public, but unpopular with art critics. “I’ve seen school buses stop by there, as well as tour buses. They take their photos and off they go.” McGaugh says. But art critics argue that the piece just isn’t good art. “[Johnson] is a complete hack as an artist,” Davies counters. “[His work] often appeals to folks who are impressed by the size . . . and find the sentiment accessible.”

What do you think? When it comes to public art, is popular opinion more important than what art critics think?

1. Why does the general public appreciate Johnson’s sculpture?
2. Why do critics argue that this sculpture isn’t original?
3. Is popular opinion of the work more important than that of art critics?

The general public appreciates Johnsons sculpture because it marked the end of World War 2. Critics argue that this sculpture isn't original because they say it is copied off of a famous picture. No, the popular opinion is not more important than the critics opinion.
Posted by: grant d. | March 17, 2015 at 1:39 PM
I personally think it is a very cool sculpture and looks great where it is!
Posted by: Z. G. | May 15, 2015 at 1:52 PM

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated by Scholastic Editors. Your comments will not appear until they are approved by the Editors.
Enter your first name and the first initial of your last name only :
Enter comments here: